Cases 1 - 10 of 27,182
Rogers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00460
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rogers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gaylord v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv01308
Plaintiff:
Philip Gaylord
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Esperias v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al.
as 25-2701
Plaintiff:
ANA ESPERIAS
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., a foreign corporation, BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., an Arizona corporation and DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive
WHEELER v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 2:2025cv00444
Plaintiff:
GERALD LEE WHEELER
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanabria v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00260
Plaintiff:
Dennis Sanabria
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Garigliano v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00261
Plaintiff:
Philip Garigliano
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moundas v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2025cv02213
Plaintiff:
Justin Moundas
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foster v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00414
Plaintiff:
Heather Foster
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER v. C.R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2025cv00390
Plaintiff:
Paul Miller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kyle Austin Noel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
