Cases 1 - 10 of 18
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cook et al
as 1:2009cv07608
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, United States Securities and Exchange Commission and United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Trevor G. Cook, Patrick J. Kiley, UBS Diversified Growth, LLC. and others
Receiver:
R.J. Zayed, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Cook et al
as 1:2009cv07604
Plaintiff:
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Trevor Cook, Patrick Kiley, Universal Brokerage FX and others
Receiver:
R.J. Zayed, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
U S Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Cook et al
as 1:2009mc00202
Plaintiff:
U S Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Trevor Cook, Patrick J. Kiley, Universal Brokerage FX and others
Intervenor:
Law Office of William J. Mauzy and William J. Mauzy
Receiver:
R J Zayed Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh & Lindquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Type:
Other Statutes
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cook et al
as 1:2009mc00201
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Trevor Cook, Patrick J. Kiley, Crown Forex LLC and others
Intervenor:
Law Office of William J. Mauzy
Receiver:
R J Zayed Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh & Lindquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Type:
Other Statutes
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Cook et al
as 3:2009mc00126
Plaintiff:
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Trevor Cook, Patrick Kiley, Universal Brokerage FX and Universal Brokerage FX Diversified and others
Receiver:
R.J. Zayed, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Cook et al
as 1:2009mc00394
Plaintiff:
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Trevor Cook, Patrick Kiley, Universal Brokerage FX and others
Receiver:
R.J. Zayed, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Type:
Other Statutes
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cook et al
as 2:2009mc03477
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, United States Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Trevor G. Cook, Patrick J. Kiley, Patrick J. Kiley and others
Receiver:
R.J. Zayed, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist and R.J. Zayed, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Cook et al
as 1:2009mc00088
Plaintiff:
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and others
Defendant:
Trevor Cook, Trevor Cook, Patrick Kiley and others
Intervenor:
The Law Office of William J. Mauzy and William J. Mauzy
Receiver:
R.J. Zayed, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist and R.J. Zayed, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Cook et al
as 3:2009mc00430
Plaintiff:
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Trevor Cook, Patrick Kiley, Universal Brokerage FX and others
Receiver:
R.J. Zayed, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. COOK et al
as 2:2009mc00320
Plaintiff:
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Defendant:
TREVOR COOK, PATRICK KILEY, UNIVERSAL BROKERAGE FX and others
Receiver:
R. J. ZAYED and CARLSON, CASPERS, VANDENBURGH & LINDQUIST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
