Cases 1 - 10 of 2,084
Halpern v. Brooks-Lasure et al
as 1:2025cv03637
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. HALPERN
Defendant:
Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, Samantha Power, GOLI SHEIKHOLESLAMI and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Lightfoot v. Oak Bend Medical Center et al
as 4:2025cv00837
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jan Elizabeth Lightfoot, Jan Christopher and Janice Marie Banks
Defendant:
Oak Bend Medical Center, Dr. Courtney Landry, RN Cathy Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pratt v. Colvin
as 4:2025cv00764
Plaintiff:
Sheila Pratt
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Garcia v. Colvin
as 4:2025cv00620
Plaintiff:
Samantha L Garcia
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JANICK v. COLVIN
as 2:2025cv00111
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. JANICK
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 (g) Social Security (RSI)
Diaz v. Colvin
as 4:2025cv00367
Plaintiff:
Waldo Balmore Diaz
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Kathleen Burckhardt v. Carolyn Colvin
as 8:2025cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Burckhardt
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jose Amesquita v. Carolyn Colvin
as 5:2025cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jose Amesquita
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Teresa Torres-Martinez v. Carolyn Colvin
as 5:2025cv00177
Plaintiff:
Teresa Torres-Martinez
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kenia Mazariegos v. Carolyn Colvin
as 5:2025cv00178
Plaintiff:
Kenia Mazariegos
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
