Cases 1 - 10 of 359
Becknell v. Colvin
as 3:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
Hillary Ann Becknell
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lutter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00260
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Lutter
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Grant v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00065
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Nancy A. Berryhill and Caroline W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Grant and Tracey Lee Grant
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Greiss v. Colvin et al
as 2:2017cv00235
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Laura Greiss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stevenson v. Colvin
as 2:2017cv00165
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Angeline R. Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Saruby v. Colvin
as 2:2017cv00150
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Joseph Saruby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kresge v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv03041
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Marsha Kresge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Marks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv03034
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David T. Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
See v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00752
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Benita Leora See
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Joyce v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv02736
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Nathan A. Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
