Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Christopher Nicholson v. Catherine Bauman
as 21-2695
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Arthur Jackson v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 21-1328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. K. BERGMAN, Prison Counselor, J. STYES, Food Supervisor, MR. [UNKNOWN] KENYON, Prison Employee and others
David Streety v. Daniel Grand, et al
as 20-2277
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF CONTRARAS, SARGENT MORAN, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of M.D.O.C. State of Michigan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID STREETY
Andrew Johnson v. Catherine Bauman
as 20-2181
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW DEAN JOHNSON
Roberta Haertel v. MDOC, et al
as 20-1904
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBIN MYERS, Clerk MDOC, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, Hearing Administer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTA J. HAERTEL
Masao Kikuchi v. Catherine Bauman
as 20-1593
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
MASAO KIKUCHI
Rufus Spearman v. MI, et al
as 20-1476
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS G. FINCO, ROBERT NAPEL, Warden, SHANE PLACE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN
Johnny Tippins v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 20-1480
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CHAMBERLIN, Prison Counselor, ANTHONY IMMEL, Deputy Warden, G. SCHEAM, Resident Unit Manager and others
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director and CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY TIPPINS
Travis Longmire v. MDOC, et al
as 20-1389
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS SANTELL LONGMIRE
James Butler v. Connie Horton
as 20-1239
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES BUTLER
Respondent / Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden and CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
