Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Hood et al v. Medical Solutions L.L.C.
as 1:2025cv04198
Plaintiff:
Josephine Hood and Anita Cavers
Defendant:
Medical Solutions L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Caver, et al. v. Prestige Default Services, LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv04850
Defendant:
US Bank TRust National Association, As Trustee of the BKPL-EG Basket Trust, Prestige Default Services, LLC and SN Servicing Corporation
Plaintiff:
Quinton Caver and Shalaetha Preston-Caver
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Caver v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05934
Defendant:
Loreal USA Products, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC, SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kiuana J Caver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Silvey v. Denton County, Texas, et al
as 4:2024cv00627
Defendant:
Bruce Elsey, Does 1 through 25, Barry Caver and others
Plaintiff:
Lanette Silvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peterson v. Dockery et al
as 4:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Jake Michael Peterson
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Dwayne Dockery, Asst. Chief Deputy Barry Caver, Lawrence Goodno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullins v. Graham et al
as 4:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Sharda L. Mullins
Defendant:
C. Graham, B Caver, S. Sprabary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullins v Graham et al
as 4:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Sharda L. Mullins
Defendant:
Sergeant C. Graham, Chief Deputy B. Caver, S. Sprabary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
