Cases 11 - 20 of 7,426
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant:
DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Bracy v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv06937
Plaintiff:
Horace L. Bracy
Cross Defendant:
ABB, Inc.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Anco Insulations, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Huntington Ingalls, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (as insurer of Wayne Manufacturing Company), The Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust, Uniroyal Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pe Personal Injury
Dean, Sr. et al v. AII Acquisition LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01467
Defendant:
AII Acquisition LLC, Flowserve Corporation, Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA and others
Plaintiff:
Nile Dean, Sr. and Camellia Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Leopold v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv03713
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company doing business as NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ASSOCIATION also known as NAPA, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Morse TEC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Leopold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Becker v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv06900
Plaintiff:
Patricia A Becker
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., Albert L Bossier, Jr and others
Cross Defendant:
Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP and Eagle, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Paramount Global, Uniroyal Inc., Manville Personal Injury Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Pritt v. John Crane Inc.
as 23-1953
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUTH A. PRITT
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN CRANE INC.
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, VIACOMCBS, formerly doing business as CBS Corporation and AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor-by-merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.
King et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 7:2023cv05771
Defendant:
Clark-Reliance LLC, Crane Instrumentation & Sampling Pft Corp, Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff:
Richard D King and Lonie C King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Lewis et al v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv06764
Plaintiff:
Brouney Lewis, Monica Kelly-Lewis, Levar Lewis and others
Cross Defendant:
Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., General Electric Company, Redco Corporation and others
Defendant:
Kohler Co., Flow Smart Inc., Albert Bossier and others
Cross Claimant:
Huntington Ingalls, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
International Paper Company, Paramount Global, Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
ELG Utica Alloys, Inc. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
as 23-7575
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELG UTICA ALLOYS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP., DBA National Grid, SPECIAL METALS CORP., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL GRID GROUP PLC
Not Yet Classified:
CBS CORPORATION, (successorininterest to Westinghouse Electric Corporation) AKA Paramount Global
Attebury et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv05014
Plaintiff:
Ervel Attebury and Lutrecia Attebury
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
