Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Turner v. Unknown Party, et al.
as 25-555
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTY, Yolo County Mayor, CDCR DIRECTOR, RON BROOMFIELD and others
Stevens v. CDCR Director et al
as 3:2025cv00191
Plaintiff:
Dean M. Stevens
Defendant:
CDCR Director, CMO Chief Medical Doctors and Chief Dentist (C.W.P.)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. CDCR Director, et al.
as 25-67
Petitioner:
KENYATTA Q. MITCHELL
Respondent:
WARDEN, CDCR DIRECTOR and CHRISTIAN PFIEFFER, named as C. Pfieffer
Stevens v. CDCR Director et al
as 5:2024cv08980
Defendant:
CDCR Director, Chief Dentist (C.W.P.) and CMO Chief Medical Doctors
Plaintiff:
Dean M. Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stevens v. CDCR Director et al
as 2:2024cv03138
Defendant:
Hardman, CDCR Director and Gavin Newsom
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. CDCR Director et al
as 5:2024cv07716
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
Hardman, CDCR Director and Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Aaren, et al.
as 24-6359
Defendant:
CITY OF MENDOCINO, Deputy BRAD JAMES, Deputy, JILL RAVITCH and others
Plaintiff:
DEAN MICHAEL STEVENS
Mitchell v. CDCR Director et al
as 3:2024cv01080
Respondent:
C. Pfieffer, Warden and CDCR Director
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Q. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans, John or Jane Doe 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner
as 3:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Turner
Defendant:
Yolo County (Mayor), CDCR Director, Warden Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
