Cases 1 - 10 of 1,546
(PC) Gallegos v. Sahota et al
as 2:2024cv02776
Defendant:
Babbala, Sahota, CDCR Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gallegos v. Saavedra et al
as 2:2024cv02777
Defendant:
Saavedra, Rios, Lopez-Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stokes v. Jenks et al
as 2:2024cv02715
Defendant:
CDCR, Jenks and Schraim
Plaintiff:
Antwone Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ramsey v. Secretary of CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv02557
Defendant:
Warden, Secretary of CDCR and B. Wheeler
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza Garcia v. CDCR et al
as 1:2024at00748
Defendant:
CDCR, J. Macomber, K. Allison and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Mendoza Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bunn v. Robertson, et al
as 4:2024cv06541
Defendant:
James Robertson, Pelican Bay State Prison, Director of CDCR and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lamont Bunn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tremaine Carroll v. Sean Diddy Combs et al
as 2:2024cv08040
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Carroll
Defendant:
CCWF Warden, MCSP Warden, Madera County D.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Urbano et al
as 3:2024cv01596
Respondent:
Urbano, Inmates Office A-2 and CDCR Officers
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. CDCR Work Change Officer et al
as 3:2024cv01599
Defendant:
CDCR Work Change Officer, Building A-2 / A Yard, Floor and Tower Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
