Cases 11 - 20 of 1,571
(PC) Stevens v. CDCR Director et al
as 2:2024cv03138
Defendant:
Hardman, CDCR Director and Gavin Newsom
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sanchez v. Johnson, et al.
as 2:2024cv02737
Defendant:
Johnson and CDCR
Plaintiff:
Mario Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Macabe v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv03090
Defendant:
CDCR
Plaintiff:
Michael James Macabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv07829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. CDCR Director et al
as 5:2024cv07716
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
Hardman, CDCR Director and Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Billie Don Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
CDCR Officers and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. CDCR et al
as 1:2024cv01336
Defendant:
Sgt. Madrigal, Servantes, Richie and others
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. CDCR CSP SAC et al
as 2:2024cv03001
Defendant:
CDCR CSP SAC, Jeff Lynch and R. Jackson
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lewis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. CDCR et al
as 1:2024cv01335
Defendant:
T. Lee, CDCR, Avenal State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Avenal State Prison, et al.
as 1:2024cv01337
Defendant:
CDCR, Gary Marshall, Avenal State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
