Cases 31 - 40 of 182
Ronquillo v. CDCR et al

as 5:2023cv04581
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Alexander Ronquillo
Defendant:
CDCR and Father Manuel Chavirra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo v. CDCR et al

as 3:2023cv04450
Plaintiff:
Mona Salcida Murillo
Defendant:
CDCR, M. B. Atchley, Johnthich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. State of California et al
as 3:2023cv03866
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Robinson
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. CDCR et al
as 4:2023cv03584
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Defendant:
CDCR, California Correctional Health Care Services, J. Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. CDCR Contract Physician/Surgeon et al

as 2:2023cv01313
Plaintiff:
D'Vaughn Cortez Hill
Defendant:
CDCR Contract Physician/Surgeon, Dr. Donback and Dr. Jeu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClintock
as 3:2023cv02882
Plaintiff:
John McClintock
Defendant:
CDCR .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rico v. Secretary of CDCR et al

as 5:2023cv02122
Plaintiff:
Jorge Andrade Rico
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR, H. Mosley, R. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Newsom et al

as 4:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hill
Defendant:
Governor Gavin Newsom, State of California, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Lynch et al

as 3:2023cv01856
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lee Miller
Defendant:
J. Lynch, A. Scotland and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arocha v. CDCR et al

as 3:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
Rudy Arocha
Defendant:
CDCR, Associate Warden Trent Allen and Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.