Cases 21 - 30 of 1,799
v. Marion II et al
as 1:2024at00583
Defendant:
Carl Bently Marion II and CDCR HQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sonier v. CDCR et al
as 3:2024cv04567
Plaintiff:
Markkis Porsche Sonier
Defendant:
CDCR, Castillo and LT C. Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Romell Bedford v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv06360
Defendant:
CDCR and Sgt. Acosta
Plaintiff:
Justin Romell Bedford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moralez v. Davis, et al.
as 24-4552
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH MORALEZ
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary CDCR, RON BROOMFIELD, Warden (A) SQ, RON DAVIS, Warden and others
Blanton v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv01278
Defendant:
Deborah Barnes, Dana M. Sabraw, CDCR Carillo and others
Plaintiff:
Derrik Blanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Underwood v. CDCR et al
as 4:2024cv04399
Plaintiff:
Willie Underwood
Defendant:
CDCR and Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erakat v. United States Internal Revenue Service, et al.
as 24-4461
Defendant:
SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME, Administrative Taxpayer Advocate, UTAHA, CDCR Counselor, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, IRS Fresno and others
Plaintiff:
AHMAD ERAKAT
(PC) Storm v. Newsom et al
as 1:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Z. Storm
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, B. Phillips, California Secretary of the CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saddozai v. Davis, et al.
as 24-4305
Defendant:
RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin State Prison, CLAWSON, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison, HERRERA, Sergeant Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Kelly v. Secretary of CDCR et al
as 3:2024cv01233
Respondent:
Rob Bota and Secretary of CDCR
Petitioner:
Russell J. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
