Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Mitchell v. CDCR Director et al
as 3:2021cv01261
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell
Respondent:
CDCR Director and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruben Herrera, Jr. v. Connie Gibson
as 21-16117
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUBEN HERRERA, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
CONNIE GIBSON, CDCR Director
(PC) Leen v. Cueva et al
as 2:2020cv02231
Defendant:
DiTomas, CDCR Director, Cueva and others
Plaintiff:
Dovie Dewdrop Leen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castro-Gomez v. CDCR Director
as 3:2020cv07058
Plaintiff:
Angel H. Castro-Gomez
Defendant:
CDCR Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Cloud v. CDCR/Director
as 2:2020cv01274
Respondent:
CDCR/Director
Petitioner:
Joel James Cloud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Cloud v. Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County
as 1:2020cv00904
Respondent:
CDCR/Director and Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County
Petitioner:
Joel James Cloud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin Jones v. People of the State of CA, et al
as 19-56495
Respondent / Appellee:
JAIME LUIS FUSTER, Deputy Attorney General, SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, LANCE E. WINTERS, S.AAG and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN WALKER JONES
David Sabino Quair, III v. CDCR-Director of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv02130
Respondent:
Joseph Rhawles, Mona Houston and CDCR-Director of Corrections
Petitioner:
David Sabino Quair, III and David S Quair, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Carroll v. State of California et al
as 2:2019cv01904
Respondent:
State of California, CDCR Director and CDCR Wardens
Petitioner:
Tremayne Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Quair, III v. California State Prison, et al
as 19-55863
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID SABINO QUAIR III
Respondent / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CSP-CDCR-Director of Corrections and CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
