Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,619
PEANORT v. CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65501
Plaintiff: MATTHEW E. PEANORT, SR.
Defendant: CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COTTON v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65975
Plaintiff: WOODROW W. COTTON
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCOY v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65872
Plaintiff: DAVID MCCOY
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROCKMAN v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65977
Plaintiff: KENNETH BROCKMAN
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILLIER, ET. AL. v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66147
Plaintiff: DONALD G HILLIER, SR.
Defendant: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , THE CELOTEX CORP. , PANACON CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER v. THE CELOTEX CORP.
as 2:2011cv65877
Plaintiff: DORIS J. FISHER
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIKOLA v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64005
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY J KIKOLA
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , TURNER&NEWALL, LTD. , H.K. PORTER CO. , INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX et al v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2011cv63577
Plaintiff: JD COX and EVALYN COX
Defendant: AC&S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC , CELOTEX CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv64082
Plaintiff: CREIGHTON E. MILLER and PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
Defendant: ACANDS, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUBENSTEIN et al v. CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv63896
Plaintiff: BETTY RUBENSTEIN and SAMUEL RUBENSTEIN
Defendant: CELOTEX CORP., PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CORP., OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?