Cases 101 - 110 of 9,231
DALTON et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66873
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS J. DALTON and ALMA N. DALTON
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARNES et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66821
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM W. BARNES and DOROTHY T. BARNES
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLEVINS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67163
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C. BLEVINS and PAM BLEVINS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KANASH et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66933
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. KANASH and JOAN M. KANASH
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUTZ et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION, THE
as 2:2011cv66798
Plaintiff:
PERSHING W. LUTZ, SR. and NEDRA LUTZ
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN, JR. et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67172
Plaintiff:
LACY E. MARTIN, JR. and CAROLINE S. MARTIN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66951
Plaintiff:
LYNN R. HAMILTON and JOAN A. HAMILTON
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67181
Plaintiff:
BOBBY D. KENNEDY and FREDA D. KENNEDY
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EALGE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUBY v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66935
Plaintiff:
S. OLIVER RUBY
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66944
Plaintiff:
ERNEST C. BROWN and THELMA E. BROWN
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
