Cases 71 - 80 of 9,232
PARKS, JR et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2011cv67169
Plaintiff:
EDWARD V. PARKS, JR. and SUSAN W. PARKS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTONIA v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66934
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. CARTONIA
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SYKES JR. et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66871
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. SYKES JR. and D. PHYLLIS SYKES
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUCKER et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION, THE
as 2:2011cv66794
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE A. TUCKER, SR. and CAROLYN B. TUCKER
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAITHCOCK JR. et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66938
Plaintiff:
HOWARD HAITHCOCK JR. and LINDA L. HAITHCOCK
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLOGGI et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66946
Plaintiff:
AMELIO J. COLOGGI and MARTHA L. COLOGGI
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66874
Plaintiff:
HARRY L. JONES and GENEVIEVE C. JONES
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66941
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. MARTIN and ELLEN MARTIN
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURST et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66950
Plaintiff:
MARTIN N. HURST and BLANCHE HURST
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWENS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67159
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. OWENS and ELLEN L. OWENS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
