Cases 1 - 10 of 177
United States of America v. Taber et al
as 0:2024cv60402
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Evan Taber, Sheva Narkes, Hawks Landing Property Owners' Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Taber et al
as 1:2024cv20967
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Evan Taber, Sheva Narkes, Hawks Landing Property Owners' Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Taber et al
as 1:2024cv20977
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Evan Taber, Sheva Narkes, Hawks Landing Property Owners' Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Centennial Bank v. Santo
as 8:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
Steven Santo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Centennial Bank v. Terra Property Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05855
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
Terra Property Trust, Inc. and Does 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Melillo v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Melillo
Defendant:
Centennial Bank doing business as Happy State Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Centennial Bank v. Hicks
as 3:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
Robert E Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Centennial Bank
as 1:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Centennial Bank v. M/V SOVEREIGN et al
as 1:2023cv21627
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
M/V SOVEREIGN and Sovereign Sons, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Foreclose Ship's Mortgage
Gomez v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Obed Gomez, Jr
Defendant:
Centennial Bank doing business as Happy State Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
