Cases 1 - 10 of 30
In Re: Benjamin Ashmore, Sr.
as 23-1091
Petitioner:
Benjamin J. Ashmore, Sr.
Respondent:
CGI Federal, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Mullins v. CGI Federal Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
Amed Mullins
Defendant:
CGI Federal Inc. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
MCNEIL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv02208
Defendant:
IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC., JOHN MORENZ, LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CGI Federal Inc. v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc.
as 2:2020cv01781
Plaintiff:
CGI Federal Inc.
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The United States of America e v. CGI Group, Inc.
as 20-1570
Defendant / Appellee:
CGI Federal, Inc., Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority and Assisted Housing Services, Tampa Housing Authority And North Tampa Housing Development and others
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The United States of America ex rel. Benjamin J. Ashmore, Sr.
Defendant:
DEF
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tollini v. CGI Federal Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03275
Plaintiff:
Fred Tollini
Defendant:
CGI Federal Inc. and CGI Technologies and Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Danielecki et al v. CGI Federal Inc.
as 5:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
Dora Bryant and Peggy Danielecki
Defendant:
CGI Federal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
