Cases 1 - 10 of 30
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15919
Plaintiff:
CHAD WRIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson et al v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson and Nikolais Lang Thompson
Defendant:
State of Montana, Greg Gianforte, Austin Knudsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00982
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02799
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHAD WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01670
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHAD WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00828
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHAD WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craft v. White, et al
as 19-2213
Defendant / Appellant:
AHMAD WHITE, in his official and individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AL-RASHAAD R. CRAFT
Defendant:
CHAD WRIGHT, in his official and individual capacity
Collins v. Fox et al
as 2:2019cv00044
Plaintiff:
Mark William Collins
Defendant:
John A Micu, Chad Wright, Morgan Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAGER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03160
Plaintiff:
JESSICA ANDERSEN, ZACH DANGERFIELD, KENNETH MCGAHA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HALL et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03065
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CHRASTKA, KEITH PETTY, EUGENE ROBERSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
