Cases 1 - 10 of 17
CALDWELL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03114
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CALDWELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CALDWELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20356
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CALDWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ahanchian v. US
as 21-1398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS B. DOUGHERTY, CAROLINE CORBETT, JACK KELLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Caldwell v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04462
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castro et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01286
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Castro , Aquanza Jones , Kaslyn Belgrave and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Raymond Griffin v. Deborah Shandle
as 16-6945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH SHANDLES, Assistant District Attorney, DONALD C. PATE, Trooper - NC State Highway Patrol, T. MCELROY, Detective - Raleigh Police Department and others
Griffin v. Shandles et al
as 5:2015ct03145
Plaintiff:
Raymond Griffin
Defendant:
Deborah Shandles, Donald C. Pate, T. McElroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clegg-Arrs v. Wiggins et al
as 5:2015ct03060
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Clegg-Arrs
Defendant:
Travis Wiggins, P. Jones, P. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00297
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and Charles Caldwell
Petitioner:
Derek N. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
