Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Hughes v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jaclyn Hughes, Emily Crawford, Monique Danene Delgado and others
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moore et al v. Carroll et al
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Moore and Brad Truitt
Defendant:
Charles Carroll and Integrated Biometric Technology
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23533
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CARROLL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carroll v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Charles Carroll
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
CARROLL et al v. JANSSEN ORTHO LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02249
Plaintiff:
DIANNA CARROLL and CHARLES CARROLL
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Defendant:
Fernetta Riley, Lt. Gartland, Charles Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67435
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CARROLL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
