Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Holt v. Commissioner of Social Security

as 3:2021cv01154
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DALE HOLT
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Berry et al v. Robert Bosch GmbH et al
as 2:2018cv00318
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, Ford Motor Company, Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Plaintiff:
Sara Rook, Aldo Granillo, Charley Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cross v. Berryhill

as 2:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Charles Dale Cross
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wilkins v. Chrisman, et al

as 16-7024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DALE WILKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY CHRISMAN, COURTNY REED, CAROLE M. DENTINA and others
Strickland v. Rowan Companies, Inc.
as 2:2015cv04816
Defendant:
Rowan Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Dale Strickland
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Wilkins v. Chrisman et al

as 6:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Dale Wilkins
Defendant:
Jerry Chrisman, Courtney Reed, Carole M. Dentina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al v. ACE American Insurance Company et al

as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Larry Mitchell and Laura Mitchell
Defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and Charles Dale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hurst v. Akzo Nobel Retirement Account Plan (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Charles Dale Hurst
Defendant:
Akzo Nobel Retirement Account Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Wollnick v. Benson, et al

as 14-1309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DALE WOLLNICK
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN D. BENSON, ROBERT DOUGLAS WOLLNICK and ELIZABETH MONTGOMERY
Wollnick v. Benson et al

as 1:2014cv00731
Plaintiff:
Charles Dale Wollnick
Defendant:
Karen D. Benson, Robert Douglas Wollnick and Elizabeth M. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.