Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Freeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Freeman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hill v. State of Illinois
as 2:2015cv02039
Plaintiff:
Greg Hill
Defendant:
State of Illinois, James Lane, Loretto Lemken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rechanik v. Garman et al
as 1:2014cv01453
Plaintiff:
Aleks Rechanik
Defendant:
Rita B. Garman , Charles E Freeman , Robert R Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Freeman v. Patrick Rice
as 12-16335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK RICE
Dwayne Griffin v. Thomas Fitzgerald, et al
as 10-1380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS R. FITZGERALD, ROBERT THOMAS, ANNE M. BURKE and others
Griffin v. Fitzgerald et al
as 3:2010cv03015
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Griffin
Defendant:
Thomas R Fitzgerald, Robert R Thomas, Anne M Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman et al v. Starcraft RV, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08275
Plaintiff:
Susan Rebecca Freeman, Susan Rebecca Freeman, Susan Rebecca Freeman and others
Defendant:
Starcraft RV, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, CH2M Hill, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Holstein vs. The American Bar Association
as 1:2009cv06239
Plaintiff:
Thomas Holstein
Defendant:
American Bar Association, Thomas R Fitzgerald, Charles E Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Freeman v. Rice
as 1:2009cv20352
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Freeman
Defendant:
Patrick Rice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
