Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Chauncey Bennett v. DPSCS of MD
as 24-6907
Defendant:
MEDICAL, STATE OF MARYLAND, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES and LATANYA DARDEN, Judge
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Chauncey Bennett v. Warden Ricky Foxwell
as 20-6115
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN RICK FOXWELL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Chauncey Demetrius Bennett v. Warden John Wolfe
as 18-6226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN WOLFE, LIBRARIAN JUNE BRITTINGHAM, L.T. VANESSA JONES and others
Chauncey Bennett v. John Wolfe
as 17-7168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN WOLFE, LIEUTENANT RUBY WHITE, LIEUTENANT VALERIE STYLES and others
Chauncey Bennett v. Warden Kathleen Green
as 17-6944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN KATHLEEN GREEN, CAPTAIN SHYTINA DRUMMOND, P.A. BRUCE FORD and others
Bennett v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2016cv04069
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Demetrius Bennett
Defendant:
John Wolfe, June Brittingham, Vanessa Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chauncey Bennett v. Kathleen Green
as 16-6724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN KATHLEEN GREEN, HEARING OFFICER SCOTT ROWE and STEPHEN T. MOYER, Secretary of D.P.S.C.S.
Chauncey Bennett v. Kathleen Green
as 16-6718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN KATHLEEN GREEN, HEARING OFFICER SCOTT ROWE and SECRETARY STEPHEN T. MOYER
Chauncey Bennett v. Kathleen Green
as 15-8009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden, DOUGLAS MATTHEWS, Captain, STEPHEN T. MOYER, Secretary and others
Bennett v. Graham et al
as 1:2015cv03757
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Demetrius Bennett
Defendant:
Richard Graham, Jr., Wayne Webb and Larry Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
