Cases 1 - 7 of 7
RIVERS et al v. AMERADA HESS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv32997
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORP. , AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN, AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC. and others
Intervenor_defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FREDRICKS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31827
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RODRIGUEZ et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv31334
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. , WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39052
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RIOS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38829
Plaintiff:
HECTOR A. RIOS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MELLEY v. A C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30836
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE R. MELLEY and LAWRENCE R. MELLEY
Defendant:
A C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
WALTON v. LYKES BROTHERS STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv73930
Plaintiff:
JUANITA WALTON and JUANITA WALTON
Defendant:
LYKES BROTHERS STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC., ACADEMY TANKERS INC, AMERCIAN FOREIGN STEAMSHIP CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
