Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Lawson-Wright v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv14429
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lawson-Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horne et al v. Equifax Inc.
as GAN/1:17-cv-03713
Plaintiff:
David Horne , Diane Brown , Kelly Flood and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc.
Horne et al v. Equifax Inc.
as 1:2017cv03713
Plaintiff:
David Horne , Diane Brown , Kelly Flood and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hills v. Campos et al
as 9:2015cv00157
Petitioner:
Elridge V Hills, Jr
Defendant:
E Campos, M Martinez, Disciplinary Hearing Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Sheppard, Jr. v. D. Wallace, Warden, et al
as 15-41073
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
D. B. WALLACE, Warden and CHERYL LAWSON, Step 2 Grievance Coordinator
Cheryl Lawson v. Charles Godfrey, et al
as 15-3063
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHERYL LAWSON
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES H. GODFREY, personally and in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Lima Police Department
Defendant:
ERIC MERICLE, II
Tuft v. The State of Texas et al
as 6:2014cv00772
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander Tuft
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Vernon Pittman, Jeorld Braggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon Douthit v. K. Dean, et al
as 14-20583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANNON DOUTHIT
Defendant - Appellee:
K. DEAN, Assistant Warden, UNIT ASSISTANT WARDEN D. MOONEYHAM, VOLGELSANG and others
Lawson v. Godfrey, et al.
as 3:2014cv00666
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lawson
Defendant:
Charles Godfrey and Eric Mericle, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon Douthit v. K. Dean, et al
as 13-20540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANNON DOUTHIT
Defendant - Appellee:
K DEAN, Assistant Warden, UNIT ASSISTANT WARDEN D. MOONEYHAM, VOLGELSANG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
