Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Chicago Title Company v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2024cv05118
Plaintiff:
Chicago Title Company
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Rashon Bowman, Keyubba Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Vaughan et al v. Wardhaugh et al
as 4:2023cv02879
Plaintiff:
Matthew V. Vaughan and Amy A. Vaughan
Defendant:
Russell L. Wardhaugh, Amanda N. Wardhaugh, Castlewood Brokers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USSEC, et al v. Chicago Title Company, et al
as 23-55413
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
KIM H. PETERSON, individually, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated April 14, 1992, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated September 29, 1983, KIM FUNDING, LLC and ABC FUNDING STRATEGIES, LLC
Defendant:
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
NOSSAMAN LLP and MARCO COSTALES
Appellee:
CALPRIVATE BANK
Receiver:
KRISTA FREITAG, Receiver for ANI Development, LLC, American National Investments, Inc., and their subsidiaries and affiliates
Deborah Barefield v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., et al
as 23-15561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH BAREFIELD, AKA Debra Barefield
Defendant / Appellee:
HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., SUMMIT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST and others
McKinzy v. J.B. Nutter & Company et al
as 2:2023cv02139
Plaintiff:
Michael E. McKinzy, Sr.
Defendant:
J.B. Nutter & Company, Money Source, Inc., The, United Fidelity Funding Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
USSEC, et al v. Chicago Title Company, et al
as 23-55252
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
KIM H. PETERSON, individually, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated April 14, 1992, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated September 29, 1983, KIM FUNDING, LLC and ABC FUNDING STRATEGIES, LLC
Defendant:
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
NOSSAMAN LLP and MARCO COSTALES
Receiver:
KRISTA FREITAG, Receiver for ANI Development, LLC, American National Investments, Inc., and their subsidiaries and affiliates
USSEC, et al v. Chicago Title Company, et al
as 23-55083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
CALPRIVATE BANK
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Appellee:
NOSSAMAN LLP and MARCO COSTALES
Receiver:
KRISTA FREITAG, Receiver for ANI Development, LLC, American National Investments, Inc., and their subsidiaries and affiliates
USSEC, et al v. Chicago Title Company, et al
as 22-56206
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
KIM H. PETERSON, individually, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated April 14, 1992, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated September 29, 1983, KIM FUNDING, LLC, ABC FUNDING STRATEGIES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Appellee:
NOSSAMAN LLP and MARCO COSTALES
Receiver:
KRISTA FREITAG, Receiver for ANI Development, LLC, American National Investments, Inc., and their subsidiaries and affiliates
USSEC, et al v. Chicago Title Company, et al
as 22-56208
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
OVATION FUND MANAGEMENT II, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Appellee:
NOSSAMAN LLP and MARCO COSTALES
Receiver:
KRISTA FREITAG, Receiver for ANI Development, LLC, American National Investments, Inc., and their subsidiaries and affiliates
Chicago Title Company, LLC v. Wilton Re Services, Inc.-Aegon et al
as 3:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Chicago Title Company, LLC
Defendant:
Wilton Re Services, Inc.-Aegon and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
