Cases 41 - 50 of 13,688
MARTINEZ v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARTINEZ
Defendant:
AKA "Tim" DEFENDANT 1, AKA Janie Quintero DEFENDANT 2, AKA "Martin" DEFENDANT 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mercado v. Haidome
as 1:2024cv02784
Plaintiff:
Christian Mercado and Debra Mercad
Defendant:
Correction Officer Haidome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Brown, et al.
as 24-2237
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
EDMOND G. BROWN, JR., SCOTT KERNAN, MATTHEW CATES and others
USA v. Christian Landeros Mendez
as 24-11102
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN JOSE LANDEROS MENDEZ
Darrenkamp v. C.R. Bard. Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01650
Plaintiff:
Christian Darrenkamp, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard. Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Castro v. USA
as 3:2024cv30053
Petitioner:
Christian Castro
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Christian Dior Couture, SA v. Cafe Dior, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv30052
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, SA
Defendant:
Cafe Dior, LLC and Gissel Santiago
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
STIER, ESQ v. POSSEBON et al
as 3:2024cv04647
Defendant:
TW BRASIL LTDA, EMPIRE STRONG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INTERMEDIATION, LLC, DIEGO POSSEBON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN H. STIER, ESQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00353
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James Cornelius Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brown v. Jantzen et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kelly Christian Brown
Defendant:
Matthew B. Jantzen, Benjamin B. Wilbughby, Troy S. Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
