Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HILDEBRANDT et al v. SIPARADIGM DIAGNOSTICS INFORMATICS et al
as 2:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
ERIC HILDEBRANDT, PAUL CHRISTIAN BURK, LAINA DUTTON and others
Defendant:
SIPARADIGM DIAGNOSTICS INFORMATICS, HEALTH LYNKS, LLC., MOHAMMED KHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
HILDEBRANDT et al v. SIPARADIGM LLC et al
as 2:2023cv21835
Plaintiff:
ERIC HILDEBRANDT, PAUL CHRISTIAN BURK, LAINA DUTTON and others
Defendant:
SIPARADIGM LLC, HEALTH LYNKS, LLC., MOHAMMED KHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
BURKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63279
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BURKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01675
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Jeffrey S Smith and Lockheed Martin Corporation doing business as Lockheed Martin Space
Plaintiff:
Christian Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IP Telesis, Inc. v. Velocity Networks, Inc., et al
as 13-55415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IP TELESIS, INC., on behalf of itself and all other stockholders of Velocity Networks, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
VELOCITY NETWORKS, INC., KURT WOLFGANG, CHRISTIAN BURKE and others
IP Telesis Inc v. Velocity Networks Inc et al
as 2:2011cv09950
Defendant:
Christian Burke, Does, Richard Gross and others
Plaintiff:
IP Telesis Inc
Stan Brown v. Michael Randle, et al
as 11-2342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STAN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL RANDLE, CASSANDRA WRIGHT, SHERRY BENTON and others
Brown v. Randle et al
as 3:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
Stan Brown
Defendant:
Michael P Randle, Cassadra Wright, Sherry Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbertson v. Burks et al
as 5:2009cv05270
Plaintiff:
Wayne Gilbertson
Defendant:
John Christian Burks and Handy Works, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
