Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barranco v. La Isla Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01323
Defendant:
Luz Maria Claudio, Madelene Nievez, La Isla Restaurant, Inc. doing business as La Isla Cuchifrito and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Barranco
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv06850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez et al v. The Hummus & Pita Co. Franchising, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv10108
Defendant:
Hummus & Pitas NYC LLC, Janice Axelrod, The Hummus & Pita Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Perez, Victor Hugo Casarrubias Bustamante and Victor Hugo Casarrubiasbustamante
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Villatoro et al v. The Hummus & Pita Company, Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06701
Plaintiff:
Bilelio Villatoro and Daniel Silva Garcia
Defendant:
The Hummus & Pita Company, Co. Inc., The Hummus & Pita Franchising, LLC., John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Palm v. Associated Credit Service Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Shanika Palm
Defendant:
Associated Credit Service Inc , Christina Doe and David Solberg
Counter_claimant:
David Solberg , Christina Doe and Associated Credit Service Inc
Counter_defendant:
David Solberg , Christina Doe and Associated Credit Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ANTONIO v. DOE
as 2:2011cv00948
Plaintiff:
ELISA ANTONIO
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF VINCENT P. CIGNARALE, LLC and CHRISTINA DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Gomez-Lozada v. Ryder Memorial Hospital, et al
as 3:2009cv01222
Plaintiff:
Michelle A. Gomez-Lozada, Michelle A. Gomez-Lozada, Keishly Annette Martinez-Gomez and others
Defendant:
Ryder Memorial Hospital, Pedro A. Diaz-Bretana, Insurance Company Y and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
