Cases 21 - 30 of 237
HIGGASON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv02080
Defendant:
PFLEEGER, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CHARLIE FOX and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. HIGGASON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffries v. Nowatzke et al
as 3:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Richard Brown, Gipson, Christina Reagle and others
Plaintiff:
Nojir Jeffries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNOLDS v. LEFFLER et al
as 2:2024cv00527
Defendant:
JOHN EDWARDS, MADISON PASSMORE, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELO REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. HAAKE et al
as 1:2024cv01949
Defendant:
J. ERNIST, TAYLOR MCCORKLE, TRENT ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gregory v. Robert Carter, Jr., et al
as 24-2879
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR. and DAVID LIEBEL
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. GREGORY
WINDOM v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv01855
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE
Plaintiff:
AARON WINDOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Autumn Cordellione v. Christina Reagle
as 24-2838
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Correction, in her official capacity
Plaintiff:
AUTUMN CORDELLIONE, also known as JONATHAN RICHARDSON
THOMAS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00491
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEANNA DWENGER, NIKKI TAFOYA and others
Plaintiff:
RICKEA D. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00834
Defendant:
Jason Smiley, John Mendiola, Kenneth Gann and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin R Bruce
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARKER v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2024cv00462
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, BRIAN SMITH, BOBBY-JOE and others
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
