Cases 1 - 5 of 5
STANLEY v. QUAKER VALLEY FOODS, INC.
as 2:2024cv02746
Defendant:
QUAKER VALLEY FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE STANLEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Stanley et al v. Ameren Illinois Company et al
as 1:2012cv06073
Plaintiff:
Peter Stanley and Christine Stanley
Defendant:
Ameren Illinois Company, Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor, LLC , Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Brand Insulations, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Brand Insulations, Inc. , Ameren Illinois Company, Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Morpurgo v. Incorporated Village of Sag Ha
as 10-1043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Annselm Morpurgo, M.A.
Defendant:
Thomas Fabiano, Michael A. Wolohojian and Ed Deyermond, as retired elected Mayor
Defendant - Appellee:
Incorporated Village of Sag Harbor, and Gregory N. Ferraris as appointed Mayor, Edward Deyermond as retiring elected Mayor, and J. Doe #1 through #N of the elected Board of Trustees, Sag Harbor Village Police, and Thomas Fabiano as Police Chief, Police Officer Patrick Milazzo, Suffolk County Water Authority, and Paul Greenwood as Assistant Superintendent and others
BARRIOS v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2007cv01244
Plaintiff:
FREDDY RENE BARRIOS
Defendant:
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morpurgo v. The Incorporated Village of Sag Harbor et al
as 2:2007cv01149
Plaintiff:
Annselm Morpurgo
Defendant:
The Incorporated Village of Sag Harbor, Sag Harbor Village Police, Sag Harbor Village Buildings Department and others
Cross Claimant:
John Jermain Memorial Library, Gregory N. Ferraris and Gregory N. Ferraris
Cross Defendant:
Suffolk County Water Authority, Caleca & Towner, PC, John Jermain Future Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.