Cases 1 - 10 of 77
HOBBS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2025cv00550
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HOBBS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clayton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Mahan et al v. County of Saratoga
as 1:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Andrea Dycha, Jenae Heflin, Daniel Breda and others
Defendant:
County of Saratoga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rice v. Wilson et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clayton Rice
Defendant:
Bryan Wilson and The City of Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLAYTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24172
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIMMONS v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS
as 3:2022cv17897
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON SIMMONS
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNair v. Melbourne Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Michael D. McNair
Defendant:
Melbourne Police Department, Christopher Clayton and Luke Dummer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Christopher Pfaff
as 22-1746
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Clayton Pfaff
Jake Simmons v. Joseph Hankins, et al
as 21-3264
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAKE SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH HANKINS, GREG SCOTT and CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON
Christopher Clayton v. Tri City Acceptance, Inc., et al
as 21-5431
Defendant / Appellee:
BETTY BYRD, TRI CITY ACCEPTANCE, INC. and TRANS UNION, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
