Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Pelletier v. Neves et al
as 3:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Pelletier
Defendant:
Judge Kerry Neves, John D. Kinard, Nicole Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vendlinski v. Snyder Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Vendlinski
Defendant:
Snyder Police Department, Officer Ryan Reeves, Officer NFN 5:22-CV-134 Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sevier v. USA
as 3:2022cv00872
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Sevier
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hinshaw v. Frederick et al
as 6:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Defendant:
John Frederick, Mohammed Abubakari, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinshaw v. Frederick et al
as 9:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Defendant:
John Frederick, Mohammed Abubakari, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sevier v. Grant
as 3:2021cv02899
Petitioner:
Christopher Sevier and Christopher Michael Sevier
Respondent:
S Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Burgess v. TDCJ
as 7:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Burgess
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinshaw v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv01955
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BrainFreeze Corp. v. Ulloa et al
as 5:2021cv00254
Plaintiff:
BrainFreeze Corp.
Defendant:
Christopher Michael Mueller doing business as Brain Freeze Daiquiri and Blanca Estrela Ulloa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Hinshaw v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv01249
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
