Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MARTIN et al v. TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2021cv12379
Defendant:
BLOOMFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, Cindy Sherman, Christopher Romano and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gebhardt and Christopher Jennings
Plaintiff:
Jason O. Martin and JOSEPH O. MARTIN
3Rd Party Defendant:
Leo Inglima-Donaldson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROMANO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06077
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ROMANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUGH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03508
Plaintiff:
CALLUM WILSON, MAHEEN SHAFI, CHRISTOPHER ROMANO and others
Defendant:
DENNIS WILSON, JANE/JOHN DOES 1-100, RICHARD NICOLETTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Romano et al v. Site Acquisitions, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00384
Plaintiff:
Shane Bruneau, Michael Petros and Christopher Romano
Defendant:
Site Acquisitions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Burman v. Romano et al
as 8:2012cv03545
Plaintiff:
Allah Akbar Burman
Defendant:
Christopher Romano, Joshua Webster and Matthew McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Finkel v. Metro Electrical Control Systems Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv02012
Defendant:
College Electric Corp., Metro Electrical Control Systems Ltd. and Christopher Romano
Plaintiff:
Dr. Gerald Finkel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Padilla et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv02004
Plaintiff:
Bryan Padilla, Luis Ramirez, Thomas Nieves and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Daniel Bryne, John Fitzgibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornielle v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. et al
as 2:2008cv01562
Plaintiff:
George Cornielle
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage Corp., Aaron Wider, HTFC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
