Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Beasley v. United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02085
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Beasley
Defendant:
United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC, Brian Scott Landon, Bluff City Mortgage Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Brown v. Citi Mortgage, inc. et al
as 3:2023cv04186
Plaintiff:
Lenora Brown
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage, inc. and Dyck O'Neal, Inc.
Hale v. Citi Mortgage Inc et al
as 3:2022cv01583
Plaintiff:
Norman Wayne Hale
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage Inc and Cenlar FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Carter v. Citi Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04794
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tamela Carter
Cause Of Action: 28:l332
WYLIE v. STRAUCH et al
as 1:2020cv01512
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL QUENTIN WYLIE
Defendant:
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE INC. and KATHLEEN STRAUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
International City Mortgage, Inc. v. Monica Diaz et al
as 2:2019cv04065
Plaintiff:
International City Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Monica Diaz, Does 1 through 5, inclusive and John D. Matthews
Oparaji v. ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01650
Defendant:
ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc., Terry Johnson, Richard M. Babeck and others
Plaintiff:
Ada Oparaji
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phyllis D. Scott v. Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2019cv00564
Defendant:
The City of Los Angeles Inc, Housing and Urban Development and Citi Mortgage Inc.
Plaintiff:
Phyllis D. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berardi et al v. Dream House Mortgage Corp et al
as 1:2018cv01208
Defendant:
Harmon Law Offices, Commonwealth Auction Associates. Inc., MCM Capital Partners, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Aldo Berardi and Chrystina Bekier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
