Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PURDUM v. CITIGROUP, INC.
as 5:2023cv03035
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. PURDUM, JR.
Defendant:
CITIGROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WATSON v. CITIGROUP, INC.
as 2:2014cv06467
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY WATSON
Defendant:
CITIGROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reich v. Citigroup, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01106
Plaintiff:
Shirley A. Reich
Defendant:
Citigroup, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Residential Finance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HERSH et al v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01344
Plaintiff:
RANDY A. HERSH and MELINDA A. HERSH
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. , CITIGROUP, INC. and CITIBANK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv04352
Plaintiff:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE PENNSYLVANIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AUTHORITY
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BARCLAY'S BANK PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITIGROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01628
Plaintiff:
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
CITIGROUP INC. and CITIBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
