Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Connie Reguli v. Lori Russ, et al
as 23-5925
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONNIE REGULI
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI RUSS, BRENTWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF BRENTWOOD, TN
Mungamuri v. City of Brentwood, MO et al
as 4:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Hannah Mungamuri
Defendant:
City of Brentwood, MO and Michael Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reguli v. Russ et al
as 3:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli
Defendant:
Lori Russ, Brentwood Police Department and City of Brentwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Doe v. Nunemaker et al
as 4:2022cv02963
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Joe Nunemaker, Dustin Greene, Darryl J. Holcombe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Doe v. Nunemaker et al
as 2:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Joe Nunemaker, Dustin Greene, Darryl J. Holcombe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arch Energy, L.C. v. City of Brentwood et al
as 4:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Arch Energy, L.C.
Defendant:
City of Brentwood, David Dimmitt, David Pfluka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
PRIES v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2021cv04890
Defendant:
Contra Costa County, City of Antioch, City of Brentwood and others
Plaintiff:
CODY PRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russo v. Contra Costa County et al
as 4:2020cv07055
Plaintiff:
Katherine Denise Russo
Defendant:
City of Brentwood, Brentwood Police Department, Contra Costa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Williamson County et al
as 3:2020cv00422
Defendant:
City of Franklin, Williamson County, City of Brentwood and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
