Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rothschild v. Wagstaffe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05739
Plaintiff: Mayer Amschel Rothschild and Mayer Amschel Rothschild, IV
Defendant: Stephen Wagstaffe, Todd H. Master, Jenny Li and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cady v. City of Burlingame We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv06019
Plaintiff: Thomas A. Cady
Defendant: City of Burlingame
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01207
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner: COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor: CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Huntington Beach v. FCC, et al
as 19-70146
Intervenor: CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Amicus Curiae: MISSOURI BASIN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, BERKSHIRE-LITCHFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, IOWA ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOCIATION, MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, AND ARKANSAS MUNICIPAL POWER ASSOCIATION and others
City of San Jose, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70144
Petitioner: CITY OF ARCADIA, Calfornia, CITY OF MONTEREY, California, CITY OF PIEDMONT, California and others
Intervenor: COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Seattle, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70136
Intervenor: CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF LACEY, Washington, CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada and others
Petitioner: LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES, CITY OF SEATTLE, Washington, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Sprint Corporation v. FCC, et al
as 19-70123
Intervenor: CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner: SPRINT CORPORATION
Puerto Rico Telephone Company, v. FCC, et al
as 19-70125
Intervenor: CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner: PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
Verizon Communications, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70124
Intervenor: CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner: VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?