Cases 1 - 8 of 8
City of Madison Indiana v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Defendant:
3M Company, EIDP Inc, Carrier Fire & Security Americas Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Madison Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DUPONT WATER COMPANY INC. v. CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA
as 4:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
DUPONT WATER COMPANY INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
City of Madison, Indiana v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv05402
Plaintiff:
City of Madison, Indiana
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc, McKinsey & Company Inc United States, McKinsey & Company Inc Washington DC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA v. MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. et al
as 4:2021cv00062
Defendant:
MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. WASHINGTON D.C., MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. UNITED STATES and MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Madison, Indiana v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45740
Defendant:
Claude Holt, Jr., James Coomer, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City Of Madison, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00156
Defendant:
JAMES COOMER, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EDWARDS v. WALLACE et al
as 4:2018cv00159
Defendant:
JONATHON SIMPSON, D.J. MOTE, KURTIS WALLACE and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LESSLEY et al v. THE CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA et al
as 4:2007cv00136
Plaintiff:
KRISTY L. LESSLEY, KARA J. RHODEHAMEL and KAYLA M. MESSER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF MADISON, INDIANA, ALBERT G. HUNTINGTON, JIM LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
