Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Merritt v. Target Corporation
as 4:2024cv01458
Plaintiff:
Clayton T. Merritt
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wilson v. City of Clayton et al
as 4:2024cv01457
Defendant:
City of Clayton, Lauren Keeling, Michelle Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Wilson individually and doing business as Wilcorp Consultants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merritt v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
as 4:2024cv01368
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Clayton Merritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nelson v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Clayton Nelson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clayton v. USA
as 1:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Roger R. Clayton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rimel v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
James Clayton Rimel
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Small et al v. Florissant Police Dept et al
as 4:2023cv01223
Plaintiff:
Shawnnetta Small and Hairtabulous LLC
Defendant:
Florissant Police Dept, Fegurson, MO, Ladue Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones-Williams v. Missouri State et al
as 4:2023cv00947
Defendant:
Beverly Barnett Parker, Missouri State, County of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Rozina Rhonda Jones-Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.