Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morigeau v. Lake County Montana
as 9:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Clayton J. Morigeau
Respondent:
Lake County Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danley v. Christian et al
as 6:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Daria Danley
Defendant:
Clayton Christian, Dr. Waded Cruzado and Kyleen Breslin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. McKinnon et al
as 6:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
Clayton Carter
Defendant:
Jeffery McNabb, Bryceson McKinnon and Jacob Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berkley Insurance Company v. Mikesell et al
as 9:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Clayton C. Bolles, Robin C. Bolles and Joyce Mikesell
Plaintiff:
Berkley Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rodriguez v. City of Great Falls et al
as 6:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Tom Halloran, Clayton Henderson, Adam Stergionis and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Salmonson et al
as 2:2018cv00019
Petitioner:
Clayton Russell
Respondent:
James Salmonson and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCloskey v. Big Sky Senior Living On Waterford Way et al
as 2:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Clayton James McCloskey
Defendant:
Big Sky Senior Living On Waterford Way , Waterford Operating and John and Janes Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Skinner v. City of Missoula et al
as 9:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Clayton Skinner, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Missoula, Missoula Police Department, John Doe 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
