Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Vines v. Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00392
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
Petitioner:
Clayton Vines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stinson v. S.W.V.R.J.A. et al
as 7:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clayton Stinson
Defendant:
S.W.V.R.J.A., Cpt. Randy Mullins, Lt. Dunford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Wilson et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clayton Rice
Defendant:
Bryan Wilson and The City of Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felton v. Sussex I State Prison et al
as 3:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Clayton Felton
Defendant:
Sussex I State Prison, Riner, King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. De la Cruz et al
as 3:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Sidney Green
Defendant:
Stephanie De la Cruz, Martha Clayton and Lorema Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City Attorney
as 3:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Clayton Robinson
Defendant:
City Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Robinson v. City of Richmond Police Department
as 3:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Clayton Robinson
Defendant:
City of Richmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City of Richmond, et al.
as 3:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Clayton Robinson
Defendant:
Tori Cotman, Jason Hudson, Jannifer Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
