Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Davis, Jr. v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00192
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Stephen Clayton Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Marriott International, Inc.
as 2:2020cv01489
Plaintiff:
Kim Clayton Davis and Tiffany Davis
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc. doing business as The Stones Hotel Legian Bali, Autograph Collection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv76766
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71597
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK CLAYTON DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv09276
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JARED CLAYTON DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv09285
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JARED CLAYTON DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shehadi v. Cusson et al
as 3:2018cv00360
Defendant:
Clayton Davis, Greg Giantonio, Seth Quider and others
Plaintiff:
William H Shehadi, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Theriot v. Davis et al
as 2:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Luke G Theriot
Defendant:
Clayton Davis and Dustin B Gaudet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theriot v. Lake Charles et al
as 2:2016mc00020
Plaintiff:
Luke Theriot
Defendant:
Police Dept City of Lake Charles, Joey Romero, Clayton Davis and others
Davis v. Saxton et al
as 4:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Randy Clayton Davis
Defendant:
T Saxton and Luke Wimberly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
