Cases 1 - 10 of 42
James v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00942
Defendant:
Circuit Justice Kent Jordan, Circuit Chief Justice Chagares, United States and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon M. James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1952
Defendant:
SHANE TROXLER, COLM F. CONNOLLY and COLLINS J. SEITZ
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Defendant:
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, BRENT WIBLE, JUDGE MATTHEW W. BRANN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00221
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Collins Seitz and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE COLM F. CONNOLLY and COLLINS J. SEITZ
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00177
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly and Collins Seitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cooper v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Tiayoakashima Cooper
Defendant:
Conner B. Wilson, Judge Colm F. Connolly, Kali Sudler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brandon AdamsIn re: Brandon Adams
as 24-1334
Petitioner:
In re: BRANDON ADAMS
Respondent:
NAVIENT CORP and COLM F. CONNOLLY
Smith v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
James Richard Smith, III
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
