Cases 1 - 10 of 141
MANENTE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE et al
as 2:2024cv05323
Plaintiff:
VITO MANENTE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, IRS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Maureen Robinson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-1070
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAUREEN ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Anastasios Smalis v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-3108
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANASTASIOS M. SMALIS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Benito Palmarini, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-2348
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENITO PALMARINI and BERNADETTE PALMARINI
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Palmarini Inc v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-2347
Petitioner / Appellant:
PALMARINI INC
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Techtron Holding Inc v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-2086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TECHTRON HOLDING INC
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
EZEKWO v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv02747
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, GERALD MOISE and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EZEKWO v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 2:2023cv02747
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, GERALD MOISE and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EZEKWO v. BRINGER et al
as 2:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
NORAH E. BRINGER, ARTHUR T. CATTERALL, DAVID A. HUBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUCKNER et al v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G. BUCKNER and GAIL D. BUCKNER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
