Cases 1 - 10 of 3,117
Florence v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Matthew Florence
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Oster v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Oster
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rybicki v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
John Rybicki
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nichols v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Matthew Nichols
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rubottom-Langeneckert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lynn Rubottom-Langeneckert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tammy Spader v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1683
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Spader
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Onken v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv04017
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Amber Onken
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vojchehoske v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Steven Vojchehoske
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Barber v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christina Barber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 a Supplemental Security Income benefits (SSID)
Good v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Mark Good
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 a Supplemental Security Income benefits (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
