Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Smart v. Winner et al
as 6:2024cv00065
Defendant:
Jane Doe 2, Dr. Rees, Connie Winner and others
Plaintiff:
Forrest Scott Smart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Winner, et al.
as 24-1912
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ROSE
Defendant:
CONNIE WINNER, TRISDAN KOHUT, REESE, Dr. and others
Race v. Montana State Prison Infirmary, et al.
as 24-38
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL SIDNEY RACE
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTANA STATE PRISON INFIRMARY, PAUL REES, Dr. NEUMEISTER and others
Jeremy Braulick v. Paul Rees, et al
as 23-35331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY JOHN BRAULICK
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL REES, ERIC THOMAS, JODY COZBY and others
Thomas Sliwinski v. Brian Gootkin, et al
as 23-35074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS EMIL SLIWINSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN GOOTKIN, PAUL REES, BILTOFT, Lt. and others
Braulick v. Rees et al
as 6:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jeremy John Braulick
Defendant:
Paul Rees, Eric Thomas, Jody Cozby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perfetto v. FNU Harmon et al
as 6:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Andrew Perfetto
Defendant:
FNU Harmon, John/Jane Doe Director of Nursing, Cynthia Wolken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Albert v. Montana Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-35637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN ALBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOC-MT CLINICAL SERVICES DIVISION, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Warner v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PLETCHER et al v. GIANT EAGLE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01361
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY PLETCHER, JOSIAH KOSTEK, NICHOLAS CONLEY and others
Defendant:
GIANT EAGLE, INC. and C&J GROCERY CO., LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.