Cases 1 - 10 of 11
James McNeill v. Monica Bond
as 23-6181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MONICA BOND
Defendant:
CAMERON GADDY, NICOLAS BUSTILLOS, VIGO and others
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. Capt. Covington
as 21-7438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPT. COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR., KATY POOLE and others
MOORE v. UR BOARD et al
as 1:2020cv01044
Defendant:
NURSE ATKINS, NURSE GRESHAM, P.A. ELAINE DIMICCO and others
Plaintiff:
RECARDO MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYMMES v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2020cv00887
Defendant:
VICTOR LOCKLEAR, ANGELA M. DELLARIPA, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cromartie v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety of Prisions et al
as 3:2020cv00432
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie and Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Hardin, North Carolina Department of Public Safety of Prisions and Connie Locklear-Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James McNeill v. Barsha Sims
as 19-6627
Defendant:
PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR, DEAN LOCKLEAR, CAMERON GADDY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VIGO and BARSHA SIMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
BARNETT v. KELLY et al
as 1:2019cv00375
Defendant:
J. BINGHAM, BRENDA G. KELLY, CONNIE LOCKLEAR-JONES and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. LOCKLEAR-JONES
as 1:2019cv00303
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR.
Defendant:
DR CONNIE LOCKLEAR-JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNEILL v. GADDY et al
as 1:2018cv00786
Defendant:
PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR, DEAN LOCKLEAR, CAMERON GADDY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
