Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Properties of the Villages, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
as 5:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Properties of the Villages, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Public Citizen, The American Hotel & Lodging Association, American Investment Council and others
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
ATS TREE SERVICES, LLC v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2024cv01743
Plaintiff:
ATS TREE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Lina M Khan, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Amicus Curiae:
National Retail Federation, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, Inc., INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ryan LLC v. Federal Trade Commission
as 3:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Ryan LLC
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission
Intervenor:
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Business Roundtable, Texas Association of Business and others
Petitioner:
National Retail Federation, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center Inc, International Franchise Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, The Futures Industry Association, The Managed Funds Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Paula Wallrich, et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Incorporated, et al
as 23-2842
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAULA WALLRICH, DANIELLE JONES, GRANT GRINNELL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INCORPORATED and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LIMITED
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION and others
Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Inst, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1062
Petitioner:
Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, Consumer Technology Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Insti, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1196
Petitioner:
Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, Consumer Technology Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
NETCHOICE LLC et al v. MOODY et al
as 4:2021cv00220
Defendant:
KYMBERLEE CURRY SMITH, PATRICK GILLESPIE, JONI ALEXIS POITIER and others
Plaintiff:
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION doing business as CCIA, NETCHOICE, LLC doing business as NETCHOICE and NETCHOICE LLC doing business as NETCHOICE
Amicus Curiae:
TECHFREEDOM, CHAMBER OF PROGRESS, CONNECTED COMMERCE COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Air-Conditioning, Heating, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1082
Respondent:
Jane Nishida, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,, Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Petitioner:
National Association of Manufacturers, Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute, Information Technology Industry Council and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
